Baby Reindeer officially declared not a “true story” by judge
Seven months after it dropped on Netflix, a judge has ruled that Baby Reindeer can’t be classified as a “true story”, allowing Fiona Harvey to proceed with her defamation lawsuit.
Not long after the stalker horror story arrived on thestreaming service, cybersleuths were quick to accuse Fiona Harvey of being the “real life Martha.” In the months following, Harvey went on a campaign of rebuttal, even appearing on thePiers Morgan’s showin the most controversial interview of 2024.
Harvey then filed adefamation lawsuitin June against Netflix for $170 million, alleging that Baby Reindeer had lied about her sexual assault and imprisonment. These were all events depicted in what the streamer described as a show based on “true story.”
In July, Netflix filed a motion to throw out the lawsuit, with Gadd maintaining that Harvey had stalked him for a number of years, sexually harrassed him, and sent him more than41,000 emailsand 350 hours of voicemail messages. Although she wasn’t imprisoned in real life, he claims to have reported her to police.
On Friday 27 September, Judge Gary Klausner found that although the show opens with the statement “This is a true story” (which, according to areportby The Times, was at Netflix’s request, not Richard Gadd’s), certain details were depicted as being worse than the real life accusations against Harvey.
He said: “There is a major difference between stalking and being convicted of stalking in a court of law. Likewise, there are major differences between inappropriate touching and sexual assault, as well as between shoving and gouging another’s eyes.
Where is “You” stalker Christopher Thomas? Update on Stalking Samantha: 13 Years of Terror
The truth behind Squid Game’s alleged ‘1986 true story’ and the Brothers’ Home
Johnny Somali says child sexual harassment charges dropped due to lack of evidence
“While plaintiff’s purported actions are reprehensible, Defendants’ statements are of a worse degree and could produce a different effect in the mind of a viewer.”
It was also noted that the details found in the series would make it easy for “a reasonable viewer” to connect the fictional character of Martha to Fiona Harvey.
The judge added: “This is not the typical case where a plaintiff happens to be one of hundreds of people that match a fictional character’s broad characteristics.”
As a result ofthe ruling, Harvey’s claims of negligence, violation of publicity rights, and punitive damages were dismissed. However, she is able to proceed with a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
For more, find outwhy Martha called Donny “Baby Reindeer.”you’re able to also take a look at all ofFiona Harvey’s tweets to Richard Gadd, and the10 movies and TV shows you should watch after Baby Reindeer.
